Window режим: полноэкранный See this article for details on powertune. I'd save the money and just overclock your processor. and i forgot to mention this but the resolution was 1024*768 at 720p. – Radeon RX Vega 64. I ran the test @ 1280×720, following your criteria, with exception being windowed and not full-screen as crap 19-inch “HD-LED” wont switch to full at that resolution. The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) Overclock it, the card will protect itself against heat, And don't use furmark, that's terrible for the GPU. That's running the 1080 Preset, with NVidia driver now back in Quality mode. Clocks: GPU core: 1188 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz 46102 frames, 51 FPS, 87°C Core Voltage—- 1031(mV) With PowerTune set to +20%, the HD 6970 CF gets around 4700 points. GPU mem: 1300MHz CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 245 Processor CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. resolution:1920×1080 Drivers Catalyst 12.3 -8.961-120405a-137813C-ATI (4-5-2012) clocks: GPU core: 1084 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). SCORE: 3778 points (62 FPS), Submitted by kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:11 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds FPS: min:80, max:81, avg:80 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Scores on this page must be bad…. Getting a new 8350 machine with a gtx 780 next week and I will run same exact test. 22.214.171.1247 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) SLI This seems to occur with 7850,7870,7950 and some green cards like 660Ti according to google. – GeForce GTX TITAN Black The GP107 is the first GPU built with the 14nm process (Samsung) and packs 768 CUDA cores, 32 ROPs and 48 textures units. AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor If you have overclocked, scale it back a little. My pair of overclocked 460’s gets just over 5000 points with the 720p test. GPU temperatures (start/end): 44°C / 71°C, Number of GPUs: 1 Catalyst 13.9 – 13.152-130830a-162200C-ATI (8-30-2013) Other scores can be found online in FurMark GPU Database section. Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 2046 MB Resolution: 1280 x 720 I am getting a second card soon so i will post the CF results when i can. Th… let me know how it goes email@example.com, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113 for 720p same setting as above, http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/3289/62160830.jpg. Killer 2100 Gaming NetworkCard, my 7950 smoked the 680 in this haha http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75234, ATI Radeon HD 5770 GPU max temp got to 99… how bad is this… and should I do the full test… 99 was at about half and I just didnt like it being that hot. I suggest you do the same if you want a direct comparison. Duration: 5min Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Clocks GPU core: 860 MHz, memory: 1100 MHz Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples I meant (and 1x 4:3, leaving out 16:10) instead of (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) in above (second last) post. Windows 7 64-bit build 760 GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770, WTF? Furmark – 1920×1080 That’s crazy, is that even possible? GTX 1070 Ti Furmark Test w/ Custom Fan Curve. To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. RAM: 16383 MB Nvidia GTX 560 1GB DDR5 SCORE: 130 points (2FPS, 60000ms) Need MORE POWER , MSI Radeon 7750 Stock cooling The windowed runs use a slightly smaller than 1920x1080 resolution and allows for slightly higher FPS values) Bugs: Not displaying any logo (Intel/otherwise) in top-right box, “Renderer” stating “Intel HD Graphics” when the actual IGP is HD 2000 (same driver v2656). These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. – added Preset:2160 scores. , 6569 points (72 FPS) with two MSI GTX 670’s. Dynamic background Treiber: 126.96.36.19980 (2013.08.18)-GL: nvoglv64 FPS: min:50, max:65, avg:51 – OPTIONS: DynBkg But you should see a good difference I ran my MSI 7770/OC to 1160mhz single card and got a 1680 with the 1920 x 1080 burn in test. But this is my first pascal card. The GeForce GTX 1070 is a performance-segment graphics card by NVIDIA, launched in June 2016. Score – 9387, BURN-IN SCORE: 491 points In this review we test the GeForce GTX 1070 (Nvidia Founders Edition). Window mode: fullscreen RAM: DDR3 GSKILL Ripjaw 16383 MB Isnt that a little low for my rig? Fan: 75%. ... 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score. Oh was 1280 x 1024 dpi by the way with No Anti Aliasing! GPU core: 1280 MHz, memory: 3121 MHz While an overclocked 6970 will still smash my 6950, I’m VERY happy with 31FPS on the 1080 test…! Catalyst 13.1 GPU core: 450 MHz, memory: 790 MHz GPU core: 1228 MHz, memory: 3402 MHz – MSI Radeon R9 920X Gaming 4G, Update: 2014.09.24 Video Card: Asus - GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB ROG STRIX Video Card ($469.99 @ Newegg) ... been having the same problems since installing geforce experience and just found a solution that turned my furmark score from 3407 to 5789 go to nvidia control panel manage 3d settings 1080p Surely it should be around 30fps, like the 5850. FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL. Memory Clock: 1150mhz (+25mhz) OpenGL renderer Benchmark_name Resolution Score Submited by Date; Radeon RX 570 … Graphics score looks fine. 1090t 6 core processor 8 gigs ram. I haven't cranked up the memory clock very far as i'm new to OC'ing, using MSI Afterburner. Renderer: Geforce x2 sli GTX670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) Memory clock: 3004 MHz Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples can anyone comment on this regarding the above observed data. CPU Speed: 3510MHz Fan Speed at 100% of test 76-77% FPS: min:29, max:32, avg:30 – OPTIONS: DynBkg FPS: min:92, max:112, avg:102 Drivers: 188.8.131.5280 (8-18-2013)-GL:nvoglv64 Benchmark results for the GTX 1070 … 1080 preset: 1306 points (21 FPS, 60000 ms), Phenom II X3 720 2.8 ghz. FPS: min:86, max:87, avg:85 – OPTIONS: DynBkg FPS: min:12, max:15, avg:12 – OPTIONS: XB FX DynBkg, renderer: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C2) Oh and i modified my fan settings to run at 80% at 50 Cel and 100% at 70 cel, i had a steady temp of 60 at peak. Ambient temp is... warmer to say the least (probably around 72F so about 22C), 4 Intake fans at the front (Corsair SP120, 2 synced through speedfan to GPU temp, 2 at full speed via fan controller). CPU Speed 2395 MHz GPU mem: 1800MHz Here are the final benchmark results of this new card, compared to GTX 1080 Ti (factory-OC), 1080 (factory-OC) and 1070 (stock clocks). FurMark Preset: 1080(FHD) Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1070 MSI Armor OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by AJDaMan at 22:09 Aug … Catalyst 13.2 – Radeon RX 5500 XT GPU core: 1005 MHz, memory: 3105 MHz The same card scores 10328 points in Time Spy Extreme preset. The 1070 I received had all ports covered by plastic caps. hate it when i do that lol. ok. As much as I hate to feedback on a hard day work of blood & sweat, it seems work itself is still in progress, thus I continue. BURN-IN SCORE: 1345 points @ 1920×1080 Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 – GeForce RTX 2070, Update: 2017.12.13 Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8ghz You won't see that much of an improvement with a 6700k. Score 2192 for crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. My 6850 cyclone OC gets 23fps. MSAA: 0x. GPU clock: 1005 MHz Zum Abschluss der Leistungsbetrachtung haben wir ein paar unserer berühmt-berüchtigten Extrem-Benchmarks für Sie. How come 5+3/2=2 eh? Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 [No Service Pack], Sapphire Radeon 7870xt 2gb ddr5 Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 oc. Currently I’m benchmarking the HD 6970 but I have some problems with my X58 testbed. SCORE:1800 points (30 FPS, 60000 ms), Stock settings (800/1250) – 1696/28FPS@1080. 1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP* 1280*1024 score was 976 with 16fps is it alright? GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 77°C, Number of GPUs: 1 Overclock it? GPU core: 607 MHz, memory: 1603 MHz Pretty much okay considering the processor I have, good temps too :3, (Tested) Unigine Heaven 2.0 Direct3D 11 Scores, GpuTest 0.2.0: Cross Platform OpenGL Benchmark, FurMark Lands on Linux and OS X, AMD FirePro W9100 OpenGL 4 FP32 and FP64 Scores (Julia Fractal), (TessMark) OpenGL 4 Tessellation Benchmark: Comparative Table, Demoscene: Source Code of Farbrausch’s Demo Tools 2001-2011 Available, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494, NVIDIA GeForce 457.67 win10 x64 (Vulkan 1.2.164), AMD Radeon Adrenalin 2020 (20.12.1) win10 x64, AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 20.12.2, NVIDIA GeForce Hotfix display driver 460.97, NVIDIA Vulkan 1.2.164 developer driver 457.67, NVIDIA GeForce 460.27.04 for AArch64, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris, Raytraced Shadows in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, Microsoft's Creepy New Productivity Score Gamifies Workplace Surveillance, AMD RDNA 2: Hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing in Radeon ProRender 2.0, AMD RDNA 2 Hangar 21 Technology Demo Video (DX12 Raytracing), GeeXLab 0.39 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.38.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.37.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.36.0 released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, (Game) Imbricker 0.3.0 Released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, How to Install NVIDIA Graphics Drivers on Linux Mint 17, Electronics: blinking LED with Raspberry Pi GPIO and GeeXLab, AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce FP32/FP64 GFLOPS Table. Memory clock: 3004 MHz Please answer to mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, BURN-INSCORE:2145 points (35 FPS, 60000 ms) It strives for the excellence in power, speed, cooling, noise, gaming, and size with no compromise on performance. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples, FPS: min:65, max:66, avg:64 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 670 x2 /PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189), Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 19418 frames, 21 FPS, 79°C 8gb Corsair Vengance 1600mhz I only ask because that is the only fix I know. Catalyst – 8.723.8.2-100920a-105610C-Sony (9-20-2010) FPS: min:15, max:16, avg:14 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Average 38fps. os: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 9226 points Memory Clock—- 1375(MHz) I'd be interested in others thoughts (other than "you should have bought a 1080). 63Deg C. 1000W OCZ-ZX1000W-UN ZX Gold But can in 720. Core Clock—- 950(MHz) Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples PC Specification: FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL / Vulkan. Results: As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. Same with furmark 1.9.x and 1.10.x Any ideas???! – GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 980 Ti System Info: GPU0 – Vendor: 0x1002 – Device: 0x6798 – Max GPU temp: 71 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz CPU speed: 3499 MHz should mention OS win8 64 bit (Running the Benchmark itself, so fullscreen, not windowed. lately i have been experiencing autoshutdown problems while playing games. Arbeitsspeicher: 16330 MB ddr3 MSAA samples: 0 Temp at 100% 66c Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, i5 5675c @4.1GHz | Vega 56 | 16Gb @1866MHz. CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 4.70GHz 700W FSP Aurum PSU I swear I literally stared at the average the whole 60 seconds (plus warm-up) throughout 120+ frames. 59Deg C. Hope that fits the bill until I can get a bigger better card for this new 27-inch Asus steroescopic 3D monitor. Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 67848 frames, 83 FPS, 79°C GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3445 MHz FurMark 184.108.40.206 - score ID: 215597 FurMark(donut) | OpenGL Submitted by anonymous on Nov 30, 2020 @ 00:45:23 System Memory |2046MB Running windows from an SSD but Furmark from a WD blue drive This seems surprisingly low to me. Burn-In score:217 (3Fps) “so fast” galaxy geforce gt610 2gb, Temp at 50% 64c But I feel like this is quite low compared to my old 6850. http://www.techpowerup.com/164027/1366-x-768-The-Most-Popular-Screen-Resolution-Overtakes-1024-x-768-StatCounter.html. The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. Overpity and epic fail0rs with dual radons, you s**k everywhere with your garbage graphic cards. Why is there no 6850 listed? Разрешение: 1920 х 1080 720 preset: 2218 points (36 FPS, 60000 ms) FurMark GpuTest Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4460 3.2GHz GeForce GTX 1070 Asus ROG Strix Gaming OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by marky117 at 15:32 Jul-12 … 3D tech news, graphics cards, graphics programming and demoscene, Update: 2020.01.24 Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Does that sound alright? 2 different tests on 15 min burn. This ensures that all modern games will run on GeForce GTX 1070. Yes you’re right, I changed a bit the burn-in test mode (actually it’s a checkbox in the Settings box). 92038 frames, 102 FPS, 110°C The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is the second fastest Pascal based graphics card in November 2017. GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 72°C, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494 Operating system: Windows 8 64-bit build 9200 No Service Pack. I logged everything through Corsair Link (intervals of 60s). You know all I’m interested these days, is in Intel HD GFX which are probably still under-testing as aren’t there in above charts. Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1004 Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 Hi guys, In Furmarks I scored 3645 pts. Preset:1080 8gb mem installed (factory), will expand to the 32 at a later date There’s a headline all over a week ago. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Discussion. 6GB(3×2)DDR3 Tri-Chan Corsair Vengeance 2000Mhz Resolution: 1920×1080 (W) – AA:8 samples Max GPU Temp: 0°C The max. Tested more than twice. FPS: min:47, max:49, avg:47 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Memory clock: 1500 MHz SCORE: 4437 points, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=127093, SCORE:679 points (11 FPS, 60000 ms) Max GPU Temp: 58°C Resolution: 1280×720 (W) – AA:0 samples FPS: min:12, max:13, avg:11 – OPTIONS: DynBkg GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-0F00) 220.127.116.117 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GPU core: 940 MHz, memory: 890 MHz AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor 4050 MHz 4093 MB Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Submitted by imprimis (anonymous mode) on May 31 2013, 9:45 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds Its pretty strange. @ 2xAA Preset:1080 @ 1920×1080 saving for a better graphics card for sure but this seems to work well for what it is. i got a 413 score for ati mobility radeon 550v. Is this a limitation based on my card, Or simply my other hardware being sub-par? Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples So what’s the formula here my man. Renderer AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is ~19% faster than RTX 3080 The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 20387 ‘graphics’ points in Time Spy 1440p preset.